Bitcoin: The $105M 'Unmarked Wallet' Mystery & What It Means
Did Trump Just Tank Bitcoin? A Cynical Look at Krugman's Wild Theory
The Trump-Bitcoin Connection: A House of Cards?
Okay, so Paul Krugman—yeah, that Krugman, the one who’s never met a cryptocurrency he didn’t want to bury six feet under—is saying Bitcoin’s nosedive is all Trump’s fault. Seriously? Last I checked, the crypto market was about as predictable as a toddler with a box of crayons.
Krugman’s argument, boiled down, is this: Trump was crypto's sugar daddy, showering it with friendly policies and winks. Now that Trump’s losing his grip (allegedly), Bitcoin's feeling the burn. He calls it the "unraveling of the Trump trade.” Give me a break.
The guy points to Trump pushing for a government Bitcoin reserve (a truly terrible idea, offcourse), letting people gamble their retirement on crypto, and even pardoning that Binance dude who was swimming in money-laundering charges.
But let’s be real. Is Krugman giving Trump too much credit? Or blame, depending on how you see it. The White House spokesperson, Kush Desai, even called attributing Bitcoin's price to "noneconomic matters concerning the president" moronic. And honestly, they have a point.
Crypto's Wild Ride: More Than Just Politics
Bitcoin hitting $126,000 last month, then face-planting to $87,000? That's just Tuesday in crypto land. And the Trump family losing a cool billion in the process? Serves 'em right, maybe. But is it all because Trump's "power is visibly diminishing," as Krugman claims? I'm not so sure.

SpaceX, Musk's company, just shuffled over $105 million worth of Bitcoin into unmarked wallets. What's that about? Are they bailing? Consolidating? Or just playing games? No one seems to know.
They supposedly dumped 70% of their holdings back in 2022 after the Terra-Luna and FTX disasters. Which, by the way, is another reminder that the crypto market is about as stable as a Jenga tower in an earthquake.
And it's not just Bitcoin. The whole damn crypto market is one big seesaw. Ethereum, XRP, the whole shebang—they're all bouncing around like ping pong balls. You can't pin that on one guy, even if that guy is Donald Trump.
Look, I get it. Krugman hates Trump. He hates crypto. He sees a connection. But sometimes, a crash is just a crash. Maybe it's the Fed hinting at interest rate cuts. Maybe it's BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF sucking in fresh money. Or maybe it's just the random whims of the market.
Krugman also mentions Trump's "wavering partisan influence," the Epstein files release, and those supposed Democratic victories in New York and Seattle. As if those have anything to do with the blockchain. This is a bad idea. No, 'bad' doesn't cover it—this is a five-alarm dumpster fire.
So, What's the Real Story?
It's all smoke and mirrors. Krugman's trying to make a political point using Bitcoin as a punching bag. The truth is, the crypto market is a chaotic mess, driven by greed, speculation, and maybe a little bit of actual innovation. To say it's all Trump's fault is just lazy. Maybe I'm too cynical, but I doubt it.
